One of the most frequent arguments used by supplement nay-sayers is that there is little or conflicting evidence about a given supplement's effectiveness to support a specific health concern. Most recently calcium has been linked to heart disease. I read and here other examples daily.
If conflicting study results make supplement usage a bad idea, I submit that the same may be appropriate for mainstream health care.
ADHD: Genetic Mutation May Be Key
Study: Fussy Babies Linked to ADHD Risk
Study: ADHD Linked to Preterm Birth
I am not saying mainstream health-care is invalid, but please apply the tests for validity to all.
